<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 971 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793590</link>
    <description>A loose sheet or search statement cannot, by itself, sustain an addition unless its contents are independently and holistically corroborated by surrounding evidence; the Godhavi on-money issue was therefore sent back for de novo consideration. The limitation objection was dismissed, as the challenge based only on common Assessing Officer status was untenable, while the alternate section 54F claim was also restored with the main matter. In the individual search assessment, additions for unexplained jewellery and cash were likewise remanded for fresh adjudication because the family ownership, streedhan, gift, and household-source explanations required further substantiation before final confirmation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 971 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793590</link>
      <description>A loose sheet or search statement cannot, by itself, sustain an addition unless its contents are independently and holistically corroborated by surrounding evidence; the Godhavi on-money issue was therefore sent back for de novo consideration. The limitation objection was dismissed, as the challenge based only on common Assessing Officer status was untenable, while the alternate section 54F claim was also restored with the main matter. In the individual search assessment, additions for unexplained jewellery and cash were likewise remanded for fresh adjudication because the family ownership, streedhan, gift, and household-source explanations required further substantiation before final confirmation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>