<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 982 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793601</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment for royalty and technical fees was examined against the arm&#039;s length price methodology. The Tribunal found the later unilateral APA, under which a consolidated 1.9% of net sales was accepted for royalty and fees for technical services, persuasive for the year under appeal. On that basis, the excessive adjustment was not sustained and the APA rate was taken as the guiding benchmark, restricting the arm&#039;s length determination for those payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 982 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793601</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment for royalty and technical fees was examined against the arm&#039;s length price methodology. The Tribunal found the later unilateral APA, under which a consolidated 1.9% of net sales was accepted for royalty and fees for technical services, persuasive for the year under appeal. On that basis, the excessive adjustment was not sustained and the APA rate was taken as the guiding benchmark, restricting the arm&#039;s length determination for those payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>