https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793612 Proceedings under Form MOV-10 were still pending, so the HC held that the legality of detention without a separate detention order should not be finally decided at that stage because the issue would become academic until the confiscation process was completed. The Single Judge's direction to release the goods on a simple bond, and the finding that detention was illegal, were set aside. The adjudicating authority was directed to hear the respondent, consider the request for release, and complete the confiscation proceedings expeditiously within the stipulated time. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793612 Proceedings under Form MOV-10 were still pending, so the HC held that the legality of detention without a separate detention order should not be finally decided at that stage because the issue would become academic until the confiscation process was completed. The Single Judge's direction to release the goods on a simple bond, and the finding that detention was illegal, were set aside. The adjudicating authority was directed to hear the respondent, consider the request for release, and complete the confiscation proceedings expeditiously within the stipulated time. Case-Laws GST Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793612