https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793613 A writ challenge to a Section 73 GST adjudication order was declined on grounds of substantial compliance with natural justice: the court found the record showed the show cause notice, reminders and adjournment notice, and rejected the claim that the hearing date was unknown. It also noted that the supplementary notice was not time-barred and that the demand in the impugned order corresponded with the proposed demand. As the remaining objections turned on disputed facts requiring evidence, the court directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal, with a direction that any appeal filed within three weeks be heard on merits without a limitation objection. en-us Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793613 A writ challenge to a Section 73 GST adjudication order was declined on grounds of substantial compliance with natural justice: the court found the record showed the show cause notice, reminders and adjournment notice, and rejected the claim that the hearing date was unknown. It also noted that the supplementary notice was not time-barred and that the demand in the impugned order corresponded with the proposed demand. As the remaining objections turned on disputed facts requiring evidence, the court directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal, with a direction that any appeal filed within three weeks be heard on merits without a limitation objection. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793613