<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 236 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It rejected the demand for duty, penalties, and confiscation of goods, concluding that the appellants complied with the exemption notifications and export obligations. The Tribunal found no evidence of wilful mis-declaration or suppression, rendering Sec. 28(1) and Sec. 114A inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 236 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It rejected the demand for duty, penalties, and confiscation of goods, concluding that the appellants complied with the exemption notifications and export obligations. The Tribunal found no evidence of wilful mis-declaration or suppression, rendering Sec. 28(1) and Sec. 114A inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>