<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Scientifically estimated warranty provisions and disclosed security deposits cannot justify reassessment based on change of opinion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100925</link>
    <description>Warranty provision computed on a scientific basis was treated as deductible where it reflected a present obligation from past events, was likely to result in an outflow of resources, and could be reliably estimated; reopening on the same record was quashed because it ignored the governing principle on deductible warranty liability and material already disclosed. Reopening over forfeited security deposits linked to C-Forms was also invalid because the assessee had already disclosed the customer-wise details and the use of the amounts to meet sales tax liability, so the attempt amounted only to a change of opinion. On both grounds, reassessment was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Scientifically estimated warranty provisions and disclosed security deposits cannot justify reassessment based on change of opinion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100925</link>
      <description>Warranty provision computed on a scientific basis was treated as deductible where it reflected a present obligation from past events, was likely to result in an outflow of resources, and could be reliably estimated; reopening on the same record was quashed because it ignored the governing principle on deductible warranty liability and material already disclosed. Reopening over forfeited security deposits linked to C-Forms was also invalid because the assessee had already disclosed the customer-wise details and the use of the amounts to meet sales tax liability, so the attempt amounted only to a change of opinion. On both grounds, reassessment was set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>