https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52291 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in Appeal No. C/549/02-D, except for the confiscation of unmarked packages, ruling that the charge of misdeclaration was not sustainable due to mishandling and discrepancies in samples. In the same appeal, the confiscation of unmarked packages and misdeclaration charges were overturned as the mishandling by Air India and discrepancies in samples invalidated the misdeclaration charge. Additionally, in Appeal No. C/408/2002-D, the demand for duty based on alleged misdeclaration in a subsequent consignment was dismissed due to lack of concrete evidence, resulting in the appeal being allowed. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:23:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52291 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in Appeal No. C/549/02-D, except for the confiscation of unmarked packages, ruling that the charge of misdeclaration was not sustainable due to mishandling and discrepancies in samples. In the same appeal, the confiscation of unmarked packages and misdeclaration charges were overturned as the mishandling by Air India and discrepancies in samples invalidated the misdeclaration charge. Additionally, in Appeal No. C/408/2002-D, the demand for duty based on alleged misdeclaration in a subsequent consignment was dismissed due to lack of concrete evidence, resulting in the appeal being allowed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52291