https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100904 Revenue-sharing under a participative railway infrastructure arrangement was treated as a joint venture-like model, not as business support service, because freight collections were shared as a return on capital investment with profit and not as consideration for any identified service. The text notes that there was no service provider-recipient relationship or direct quid pro quo, so the demand on that footing was not sustainable. It also records that a bona fide belief, supported by prior Tribunal rulings on similar arrangements, defeated suppression, making the extended limitation period unavailable. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:43 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100904 Revenue-sharing under a participative railway infrastructure arrangement was treated as a joint venture-like model, not as business support service, because freight collections were shared as a return on capital investment with profit and not as consideration for any identified service. The text notes that there was no service provider-recipient relationship or direct quid pro quo, so the demand on that footing was not sustainable. It also records that a bona fide belief, supported by prior Tribunal rulings on similar arrangements, defeated suppression, making the extended limitation period unavailable. Highlights Service Tax Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:43 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100904