https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469462 A fresh special leave petition under Article 136 was held not maintainable where an earlier challenge to the same High Court judgment had already been dismissed and the later recall application was withdrawn with liberty limited only to seek review before the High Court. Applying finality of litigation, withdrawal without broader liberty, the doctrine of merger, and the limited scope of review jurisdiction, the SC held that a second invocation of Article 136 was barred in the absence of express liberty to reapproach the Court after review. The review court had also found no infirmity warranting interference, and the petition was dismissed in limine. en-us Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:59:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469462 A fresh special leave petition under Article 136 was held not maintainable where an earlier challenge to the same High Court judgment had already been dismissed and the later recall application was withdrawn with liberty limited only to seek review before the High Court. Applying finality of litigation, withdrawal without broader liberty, the doctrine of merger, and the limited scope of review jurisdiction, the SC held that a second invocation of Article 136 was barred in the absence of express liberty to reapproach the Court after review. The review court had also found no infirmity warranting interference, and the petition was dismissed in limine. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469462