<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1855 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469463</link>
    <description>Custom House Agent services rendered to overseas clients were treated as export of services because the goods were not required to be physically made available to the service provider and the service was effectively performed abroad; Rule 4(a) of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012 was held inapplicable. The service tax demand on that count was set aside, with consequential relief from interest and penalty. Freight forwarding receipts were found to arise from an independent principal-to-principal activity involving booking and resale of cargo space at a margin, distinct from CHA services; the finding that these receipts were not consideration for CHA service was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s request to restore the dropped demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:59:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1855 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469463</link>
      <description>Custom House Agent services rendered to overseas clients were treated as export of services because the goods were not required to be physically made available to the service provider and the service was effectively performed abroad; Rule 4(a) of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012 was held inapplicable. The service tax demand on that count was set aside, with consequential relief from interest and penalty. Freight forwarding receipts were found to arise from an independent principal-to-principal activity involving booking and resale of cargo space at a margin, distinct from CHA services; the finding that these receipts were not consideration for CHA service was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s request to restore the dropped demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>