<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty payment by the Irrigation Department, State of Maharashtra, for non-payment of duty on items manufactured and cleared between April 1996 to June 2000. The Commissioner confirmed duty payment and imposed a penalty but refrained from ordering confiscation due to the department&#039;s status as a State Government entity. The Tribunal ruled that goods supplied to statutory corporations were not exempt under Notification No. 74/93 as these corporations are separate legal entities and not considered departments of the State Government. The appeal by the Irrigation Department was allowed, dismissing the appeal for enhancement of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:02:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty payment by the Irrigation Department, State of Maharashtra, for non-payment of duty on items manufactured and cleared between April 1996 to June 2000. The Commissioner confirmed duty payment and imposed a penalty but refrained from ordering confiscation due to the department&#039;s status as a State Government entity. The Tribunal ruled that goods supplied to statutory corporations were not exempt under Notification No. 74/93 as these corporations are separate legal entities and not considered departments of the State Government. The appeal by the Irrigation Department was allowed, dismissing the appeal for enhancement of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>