<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1814 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469482</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271D was not leviable because the assessment order did not record satisfaction regarding any violation of section 269SS. The omission was treated as material, and the principle that penalty proceedings cannot be sustained without such satisfaction in the assessment order was applied. On that basis, the penalty was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:59:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1814 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469482</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271D was not leviable because the assessment order did not record satisfaction regarding any violation of section 269SS. The omission was treated as material, and the principle that penalty proceedings cannot be sustained without such satisfaction in the assessment order was applied. On that basis, the penalty was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>