<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>OFCD case: SC agrees to hear SEBI&#039;s plea against SAT relief to SICCL managers</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73417</link>
    <description>Securities law issues concerning the issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures (OFCDs) by Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. are under challenge, with SEBI contesting a part of the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s relief granted to four managers and the company secretary. The tribunal had treated the OFCD issuances as a public offer within SEBI&#039;s regulatory jurisdiction, while also distinguishing the position of employees from that of the directors who had authorised the prospectus and remained responsible as principals for acts done through their agent. SEBI has now challenged this limited relief before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>OFCD case: SC agrees to hear SEBI&#039;s plea against SAT relief to SICCL managers</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73417</link>
      <description>Securities law issues concerning the issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures (OFCDs) by Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. are under challenge, with SEBI contesting a part of the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s relief granted to four managers and the company secretary. The tribunal had treated the OFCD issuances as a public offer within SEBI&#039;s regulatory jurisdiction, while also distinguishing the position of employees from that of the directors who had authorised the prospectus and remained responsible as principals for acts done through their agent. SEBI has now challenged this limited relief before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>