<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 894 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793513</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on furnace oil used to generate electricity remained admissible where the electricity was consumed partly in manufacturing and partly for factory office and canteen purposes, because the amended definition of &quot;input&quot; under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, after 01.04.2011, covers goods used for generation of electricity for captive use. The Tribunal treated electricity generated and used in connection with manufacturing activity within the factory as sufficient to retain input status for the furnace oil. On that basis, the denial of credit and the consequential demand for reversal with interest were held unsustainable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 894 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793513</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on furnace oil used to generate electricity remained admissible where the electricity was consumed partly in manufacturing and partly for factory office and canteen purposes, because the amended definition of &quot;input&quot; under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, after 01.04.2011, covers goods used for generation of electricity for captive use. The Tribunal treated electricity generated and used in connection with manufacturing activity within the factory as sufficient to retain input status for the furnace oil. On that basis, the denial of credit and the consequential demand for reversal with interest were held unsustainable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>