<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 895 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793514</link>
    <description>Sugar cess was not payable on sugar actually exported out of India because the relevant notifications and circulars exempted export clearances. The Tribunal relied on the Ministry of Food notification, the CBIC circular, and its earlier decision on the same issue to hold that the levy did not survive for exported sugar. The demand, interest, and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 895 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793514</link>
      <description>Sugar cess was not payable on sugar actually exported out of India because the relevant notifications and circulars exempted export clearances. The Tribunal relied on the Ministry of Food notification, the CBIC circular, and its earlier decision on the same issue to hold that the levy did not survive for exported sugar. The demand, interest, and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>