<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 902 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793521</link>
    <description>The share-transfer dispute concerning the deceased&#039;s company shares was permitted to be pursued before the National Company Law Tribunal, and the maintainability objection under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 was not to prevent consideration of the relevant prayer or interim reliefs. The reliefs relating to the deceased&#039;s shares in the two partnership firms were found inadequately reasoned and were remitted to the learned Single Judge for fresh decision after amendment and consideration of the amended pleadings. The Court Receiver was continued and extended to the balance shares and identified estate properties, with the existing protective arrangement maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 902 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793521</link>
      <description>The share-transfer dispute concerning the deceased&#039;s company shares was permitted to be pursued before the National Company Law Tribunal, and the maintainability objection under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 was not to prevent consideration of the relevant prayer or interim reliefs. The reliefs relating to the deceased&#039;s shares in the two partnership firms were found inadequately reasoned and were remitted to the learned Single Judge for fresh decision after amendment and consideration of the amended pleadings. The Court Receiver was continued and extended to the balance shares and identified estate properties, with the existing protective arrangement maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>