<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 903 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793522</link>
    <description>B-Traxim 2C Mn-220 was held not to qualify as a separate chemically defined organic compound under Chapter 29 because its technical description showed a variable amino-acid ligand structure, fluctuating molecular weight, and no single constant molecular composition or definitive structural diagram. It was instead classified as a preparation used in animal feeding under Tariff Item 2309 9090 because its design, branding, regulatory treatment and datasheet indications showed intended use in premix and feed. Applying Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation and the relevant chapter notes, Chapter 29 was found inapplicable and Heading 2309 was treated as the proper classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 903 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793522</link>
      <description>B-Traxim 2C Mn-220 was held not to qualify as a separate chemically defined organic compound under Chapter 29 because its technical description showed a variable amino-acid ligand structure, fluctuating molecular weight, and no single constant molecular composition or definitive structural diagram. It was instead classified as a preparation used in animal feeding under Tariff Item 2309 9090 because its design, branding, regulatory treatment and datasheet indications showed intended use in premix and feed. Applying Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation and the relevant chapter notes, Chapter 29 was found inapplicable and Heading 2309 was treated as the proper classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>