<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 149 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52276</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. HPCL against a demand of Rs. 41,73,015 u/s 11D(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was successful. The dispute arose from the sale of petroleum products from the appellants&#039; depot, involving products from HPCL&#039;s terminals and other oil companies. The discrepancy in prices before and after revision led to the demand. The Tribunal ruled that Section 11D was not applicable as no specific amount representing duty of excise was collected from buyers. Consequently, the demand was set aside, and HPCL&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 149 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52276</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. HPCL against a demand of Rs. 41,73,015 u/s 11D(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was successful. The dispute arose from the sale of petroleum products from the appellants&#039; depot, involving products from HPCL&#039;s terminals and other oil companies. The discrepancy in prices before and after revision led to the demand. The Tribunal ruled that Section 11D was not applicable as no specific amount representing duty of excise was collected from buyers. Consequently, the demand was set aside, and HPCL&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>