<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 220 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order disallowing the deduction of interest on receivables for determining the assessable value of excisable goods. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s approach did not align with the requirements for claiming abatement as per relevant legal principles, as there was no evidence of charging interest over and above the price in the invoices. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of explicit documentation and adherence to valuation provisions in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 220 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order disallowing the deduction of interest on receivables for determining the assessable value of excisable goods. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s approach did not align with the requirements for claiming abatement as per relevant legal principles, as there was no evidence of charging interest over and above the price in the invoices. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of explicit documentation and adherence to valuation provisions in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>