<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 145 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52266</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim as time-barred. The appellants&#039; failure to comply with jurisdictional requirements and timely submission led to the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to Customs Act provisions and regulations for refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 145 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52266</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim as time-barred. The appellants&#039; failure to comply with jurisdictional requirements and timely submission led to the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to Customs Act provisions and regulations for refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>