<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 846 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793465</link>
    <description>Refund claims under the CGST Act were treated as timely because the limitation period was reckoned from 01.08.2019, when Circular No. 23/2019 clarified that Customs authorities would process such claims, rather than from the earlier notification date. The period was also required to account for the Supreme Court&#039;s COVID-19 extension of limitation. On that basis, the claims were not barred by limitation, the rejection on time-bar was set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 846 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793465</link>
      <description>Refund claims under the CGST Act were treated as timely because the limitation period was reckoned from 01.08.2019, when Circular No. 23/2019 clarified that Customs authorities would process such claims, rather than from the earlier notification date. The period was also required to account for the Supreme Court&#039;s COVID-19 extension of limitation. On that basis, the claims were not barred by limitation, the rejection on time-bar was set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>