<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 848 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793467</link>
    <description>An appeal arising from a common adjudication order passed outside the Bench&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, with connected appeals already pending elsewhere, was directed to be placed before the Hon&#039;ble President for constitution of a common Bench. Relying on Notification No. 1/2022 dated 24.01.2022, the Bench noted that parallel consideration of the same subject matter by different Benches should be avoided. The principles of comity and forum non conveniens supported transfer so that all appeals from the same order could be heard together. The appeal was not entertained on merits at that stage, and the appellant was directed to seek transfer through the Registry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 848 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793467</link>
      <description>An appeal arising from a common adjudication order passed outside the Bench&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, with connected appeals already pending elsewhere, was directed to be placed before the Hon&#039;ble President for constitution of a common Bench. Relying on Notification No. 1/2022 dated 24.01.2022, the Bench noted that parallel consideration of the same subject matter by different Benches should be avoided. The principles of comity and forum non conveniens supported transfer so that all appeals from the same order could be heard together. The appeal was not entertained on merits at that stage, and the appellant was directed to seek transfer through the Registry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>