<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 868 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793487</link>
    <description>A deduction claim under section 54 was treated as unavailable when it was not raised in the return of income or during assessment proceedings; the Tribunal noted that Goetze India limits the Assessing Officer&#039;s power, but does not itself create a basis to entertain a fresh claim absent an earlier claim on record. The section 50C capital gains issue was remitted for verification and recomputation because the stamp valuation and property value required factual examination, and the Assessing Officer did not respond to the remand request. The appellate order was sustained, with the deduction disallowed and the remand upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 868 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793487</link>
      <description>A deduction claim under section 54 was treated as unavailable when it was not raised in the return of income or during assessment proceedings; the Tribunal noted that Goetze India limits the Assessing Officer&#039;s power, but does not itself create a basis to entertain a fresh claim absent an earlier claim on record. The section 50C capital gains issue was remitted for verification and recomputation because the stamp valuation and property value required factual examination, and the Assessing Officer did not respond to the remand request. The appellate order was sustained, with the deduction disallowed and the remand upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>