https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793499 A writ petition challenging three appellate GST orders was found not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal lay to the Tribunal. The Court held that the grievance, including the dispute over insistence on a notarized sale agreement, involved factual and legal appreciation better suited to the appellate forum. The availability of an alternative statutory remedy weighed against invoking writ jurisdiction, and alleged breach of natural justice did not justify bypassing that remedy on the facts presented. The writ petition was therefore not entertained. en-us Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:46:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793499 A writ petition challenging three appellate GST orders was found not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal lay to the Tribunal. The Court held that the grievance, including the dispute over insistence on a notarized sale agreement, involved factual and legal appreciation better suited to the appellate forum. The availability of an alternative statutory remedy weighed against invoking writ jurisdiction, and alleged breach of natural justice did not justify bypassing that remedy on the facts presented. The writ petition was therefore not entertained. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793499