<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1969 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469422</link>
    <description>The challenge to notifications issued under clause (ii) of the proviso to section 54(3) of the CGST Act and the Rajasthan GST Act was treated as covered by an earlier binding decision upholding the validity of the provision. On that basis, the notifications were not disturbed and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. Other issues, apart from the validity of the provision, were expressly left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1969 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469422</link>
      <description>The challenge to notifications issued under clause (ii) of the proviso to section 54(3) of the CGST Act and the Rajasthan GST Act was treated as covered by an earlier binding decision upholding the validity of the provision. On that basis, the notifications were not disturbed and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. Other issues, apart from the validity of the provision, were expressly left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>