<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 220 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52248</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that credit reversal on duty paid inputs used in manufacturing medicaments to be destroyed was not required. The Commissioner acknowledged the goods were unfit for marketing, thus exempting the appellant from credit reversal under Rule 57D. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the previous order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 220 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52248</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that credit reversal on duty paid inputs used in manufacturing medicaments to be destroyed was not required. The Commissioner acknowledged the goods were unfit for marketing, thus exempting the appellant from credit reversal under Rule 57D. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the previous order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>