<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1631 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469397</link>
    <description>Only borrowing cost directly attributable to a project is required to be capitalised in work-in-progress; the balance may be charged to the profit and loss account under the project accounting policy and AS-16, so the assessee succeeded on that point. A disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct tax at source cannot remain embedded in project work-in-progress and must reduce it, so the revenue succeeded on that point. An item booked only as a transfer between inventory heads was not a current-year expenditure or prior-period claim, and the assessee succeeded. Where an identical advertisement expense issue had already been accepted in an earlier year, the revenue could not take a contrary stand in the later year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1631 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469397</link>
      <description>Only borrowing cost directly attributable to a project is required to be capitalised in work-in-progress; the balance may be charged to the profit and loss account under the project accounting policy and AS-16, so the assessee succeeded on that point. A disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct tax at source cannot remain embedded in project work-in-progress and must reduce it, so the revenue succeeded on that point. An item booked only as a transfer between inventory heads was not a current-year expenditure or prior-period claim, and the assessee succeeded. Where an identical advertisement expense issue had already been accepted in an earlier year, the revenue could not take a contrary stand in the later year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>