<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469392</link>
    <description>Delay in filing Form 21 for giving effect to a sanctioned amalgamation scheme was sought to be condoned on the basis of an affidavit explaining the lapse. The application also requested extension of time to file the order with the Registrar of Companies through E-Form INC 28 and the physical copy. The delay was condoned and time was extended by 30 days from receipt of the order, enabling compliance with the filing requirements for the amalgamation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 10:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469392</link>
      <description>Delay in filing Form 21 for giving effect to a sanctioned amalgamation scheme was sought to be condoned on the basis of an affidavit explaining the lapse. The application also requested extension of time to file the order with the Registrar of Companies through E-Form INC 28 and the physical copy. The delay was condoned and time was extended by 30 days from receipt of the order, enabling compliance with the filing requirements for the amalgamation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>