<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 203 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52244</link>
    <description>Rule 57CC(1), which requires payment calculated as 8% of the sale price of exempted goods, could not be applied where the exempted final product was not sold and no sale price existed. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the inputs were separately inventoried and accounted for, and held that the statutory mechanism could not operate on those facts. The objection based on Rule 57CC(9) was rejected, and the penalties on the assessee and its General Manager were also held unsustainable because the demand itself failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:33:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 203 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52244</link>
      <description>Rule 57CC(1), which requires payment calculated as 8% of the sale price of exempted goods, could not be applied where the exempted final product was not sold and no sale price existed. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the inputs were separately inventoried and accounted for, and held that the statutory mechanism could not operate on those facts. The objection based on Rule 57CC(9) was rejected, and the penalties on the assessee and its General Manager were also held unsustainable because the demand itself failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>