<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Evolution of Unconventional Trademarks in India: Legal Recognition, Challenges, and Protection thereof. [Intellectual Property Rights]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16661</link>
    <description>Unconventional trademarks in India extend beyond conventional word and logo marks to include sounds, colours, shapes, textures, holograms, scents, tastes, and personality-based identifiers. The Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Trade Marks Rules, 2017 provide the framework for protection, but registration still depends on distinctiveness and, where relevant, graphical representation. Sound marks and colour-combination marks are comparatively more recognisable, while shape marks are limited by functionality and statutory exclusions. Smell, taste, and texture marks remain difficult because of representation and proof concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:33:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Evolution of Unconventional Trademarks in India: Legal Recognition, Challenges, and Protection thereof. [Intellectual Property Rights]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16661</link>
      <description>Unconventional trademarks in India extend beyond conventional word and logo marks to include sounds, colours, shapes, textures, holograms, scents, tastes, and personality-based identifiers. The Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Trade Marks Rules, 2017 provide the framework for protection, but registration still depends on distinctiveness and, where relevant, graphical representation. Sound marks and colour-combination marks are comparatively more recognisable, while shape marks are limited by functionality and statutory exclusions. Smell, taste, and texture marks remain difficult because of representation and proof concerns.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:33:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>