<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793434</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in a transport commission agent&#039;s bank account were treated as business receipts routed through banking channels, so only the profit element, estimated at 5 per cent, was taxed rather than the full amount as unexplained income under section 68. The appellate authority&#039;s consideration of additional evidence was upheld because a remand report was specifically called for and furnished before the material was examined, so Rule 46A was not breached. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the restricted addition and the procedural objection both failed, and the estimated taxation of the receipts was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793434</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in a transport commission agent&#039;s bank account were treated as business receipts routed through banking channels, so only the profit element, estimated at 5 per cent, was taxed rather than the full amount as unexplained income under section 68. The appellate authority&#039;s consideration of additional evidence was upheld because a remand report was specifically called for and furnished before the material was examined, so Rule 46A was not breached. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the restricted addition and the procedural objection both failed, and the estimated taxation of the receipts was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>