<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793449</link>
    <description>Section 54F relief was treated as available where the assessee invested capital gains in a new residential property within the stipulated period, paid substantial consideration under an agreement to sell, and obtained possession, even though the registered sale deed was executed later. The Tribunal applied a practical and beneficial interpretation of &quot;purchased&quot; under section 54F, holding that the decisive factors are investment of the gain and acquisition of possession or control, not contemporaneous registration alone. On those facts, delayed registration caused by the property being mortgaged did not defeat the exemption, and the disallowance was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793449</link>
      <description>Section 54F relief was treated as available where the assessee invested capital gains in a new residential property within the stipulated period, paid substantial consideration under an agreement to sell, and obtained possession, even though the registered sale deed was executed later. The Tribunal applied a practical and beneficial interpretation of &quot;purchased&quot; under section 54F, holding that the decisive factors are investment of the gain and acquisition of possession or control, not contemporaneous registration alone. On those facts, delayed registration caused by the property being mortgaged did not defeat the exemption, and the disallowance was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>