<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liquidated damages for delayed delivery are not taxable as consideration for tolerating breach under declared service rules</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100794</link>
    <description>Liquidated damages and penalty clauses for delayed contractual performance are compensatory consequences of breach, not consideration for a consensual service of tolerating an act under the declared service provisions. Taxability requires a bilateral arrangement under which one party agrees, for consideration, to refrain from an act, tolerate a situation, or do an act; here, the contract merely imposed a financial consequence for default and did not create an independent agreement to tolerate delay. The Tribunal therefore treated recovery of liquidated damages from suppliers for delayed delivery as non-taxable and upheld the order setting aside the service tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:32:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Liquidated damages for delayed delivery are not taxable as consideration for tolerating breach under declared service rules</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100794</link>
      <description>Liquidated damages and penalty clauses for delayed contractual performance are compensatory consequences of breach, not consideration for a consensual service of tolerating an act under the declared service provisions. Taxability requires a bilateral arrangement under which one party agrees, for consideration, to refrain from an act, tolerate a situation, or do an act; here, the contract merely imposed a financial consequence for default and did not create an independent agreement to tolerate delay. The Tribunal therefore treated recovery of liquidated damages from suppliers for delayed delivery as non-taxable and upheld the order setting aside the service tax demand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:32:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>