https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469340 Regular bail under Section 21(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 was considered on broad probabilities and prima facie nexus with the alleged organised crime syndicate. The record did not show any public witness, call detail record, recovery of illegal wealth, or other independent material connecting the applicant with the syndicate after 2016, and his statement was treated as denying continued association with the main accused after that date. The arrest memo also recorded factors suggesting he was not dangerous, not generally armed, and unlikely to abscond or threaten witnesses. On that material, the applicant was held entitled to bail and regular bail was granted on terms. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:25:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469340 Regular bail under Section 21(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 was considered on broad probabilities and prima facie nexus with the alleged organised crime syndicate. The record did not show any public witness, call detail record, recovery of illegal wealth, or other independent material connecting the applicant with the syndicate after 2016, and his statement was treated as denying continued association with the main accused after that date. The arrest memo also recorded factors suggesting he was not dangerous, not generally armed, and unlikely to abscond or threaten witnesses. On that material, the applicant was held entitled to bail and regular bail was granted on terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469340