<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2035 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469341</link>
    <description>Parity in bail was rejected because it is not applied mechanically; the applicant was not similarly placed as the co-accused, who were said to have played only secondary or post-incident roles, while the applicant was alleged to have had a direct and active role in the organised crime network. The plea that the Skoda car had been sold earlier was also rejected at the prima facie stage, as the transfer was incomplete, registration remained in the applicant&#039;s name, and effective control was not disproved. The material further disclosed reasonable grounds to believe involvement in organised crime, attracting the statutory bar under MCOCA. Bail was therefore refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2035 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469341</link>
      <description>Parity in bail was rejected because it is not applied mechanically; the applicant was not similarly placed as the co-accused, who were said to have played only secondary or post-incident roles, while the applicant was alleged to have had a direct and active role in the organised crime network. The plea that the Skoda car had been sold earlier was also rejected at the prima facie stage, as the transfer was incomplete, registration remained in the applicant&#039;s name, and effective control was not disproved. The material further disclosed reasonable grounds to believe involvement in organised crime, attracting the statutory bar under MCOCA. Bail was therefore refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>