<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1713 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469342</link>
    <description>Bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act requires an accused-specific assessment of whether prosecution material, accepted at face value, establishes a prima facie nexus between the attributed individual role and the alleged unlawful activity. Participation in social-media groups, exchange of digital content and limited calls to a co-accused were identified as the principal allegations, without allegations of creating groups or disseminating objectionable material. Prolonged pre-trial custody, uncertainty over trial duration, limited attributed roles, lack of conclusive corroboration against one accused and the other accused&#039;s medical condition were relevant to the Article 21 assessment. The statutory bar on bail was considered unmet, and bail was granted on stringent conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1713 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469342</link>
      <description>Bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act requires an accused-specific assessment of whether prosecution material, accepted at face value, establishes a prima facie nexus between the attributed individual role and the alleged unlawful activity. Participation in social-media groups, exchange of digital content and limited calls to a co-accused were identified as the principal allegations, without allegations of creating groups or disseminating objectionable material. Prolonged pre-trial custody, uncertainty over trial duration, limited attributed roles, lack of conclusive corroboration against one accused and the other accused&#039;s medical condition were relevant to the Article 21 assessment. The statutory bar on bail was considered unmet, and bail was granted on stringent conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>