https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469342 Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was applied through an accused-specific bail inquiry requiring the Court to see, on the prosecution material at face value, whether there was a prima facie nexus between each appellant's attributed role and the alleged unlawful activity. The alleged conduct was limited to participation in social media groups, exchange of digital content, and a few calls to a co-accused, without allegations that the groups were created or objectionable material was disseminated by them. Long custody, uncertain trial duration, limited role attribution, lack of conclusive corroboration against one appellant, and the other appellant's medical condition were considered in the Article 21 assessment. Bail was granted on stringent conditions. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:25:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469342 Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was applied through an accused-specific bail inquiry requiring the Court to see, on the prosecution material at face value, whether there was a prima facie nexus between each appellant's attributed role and the alleged unlawful activity. The alleged conduct was limited to participation in social media groups, exchange of digital content, and a few calls to a co-accused, without allegations that the groups were created or objectionable material was disseminated by them. Long custody, uncertain trial duration, limited role attribution, lack of conclusive corroboration against one appellant, and the other appellant's medical condition were considered in the Article 21 assessment. Bail was granted on stringent conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469342