<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2038 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469347</link>
    <description>Aircraft maintenance engineering training conducted with DGCA approval and ending in a DGCA-approved certificate was treated as falling within the statutory exclusion from &quot;commercial training or coaching&quot; because the course operated under the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and the certificate was recognised by law for the relevant purpose. Applying that principle, the institute was not liable to service tax on the training activity, and the demand with penalties was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2038 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469347</link>
      <description>Aircraft maintenance engineering training conducted with DGCA approval and ending in a DGCA-approved certificate was treated as falling within the statutory exclusion from &quot;commercial training or coaching&quot; because the course operated under the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and the certificate was recognised by law for the relevant purpose. Applying that principle, the institute was not liable to service tax on the training activity, and the demand with penalties was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>