https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469388 Directions were issued to secure compliance with the earlier refund order after the petitioner alleged non-disbursal of the refund amount. The respondent stated that the refund application had been sent to the wrong ward officer, which caused the delay. The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh refund application within one week and required the refund to be processed expeditiously thereafter. The concerned official was also directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:25:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469388 Directions were issued to secure compliance with the earlier refund order after the petitioner alleged non-disbursal of the refund amount. The respondent stated that the refund application had been sent to the wrong ward officer, which caused the delay. The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh refund application within one week and required the refund to be processed expeditiously thereafter. The concerned official was also directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. Case-Laws GST Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469388