<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1773 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469337</link>
    <description>In bail matters under the UAPA, the court applies a limited surface review of prosecution material on broad probabilities, without a mini-trial or detailed admissibility analysis. Applying the principles in Watali and Vernon, the Delhi HC treated the charge-sheet as a whole and found allegations of links with proscribed terrorist organisations, online propaganda, logistical support, and harbouring of militants sufficient to show prima facie truth. It held that documents forming part of the prosecution case cannot be discarded at the bail stage merely for admissibility objections, and that the embargo under Section 43D(5) applied. The refusal of bail was therefore sustained, with no view expressed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1773 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469337</link>
      <description>In bail matters under the UAPA, the court applies a limited surface review of prosecution material on broad probabilities, without a mini-trial or detailed admissibility analysis. Applying the principles in Watali and Vernon, the Delhi HC treated the charge-sheet as a whole and found allegations of links with proscribed terrorist organisations, online propaganda, logistical support, and harbouring of militants sufficient to show prima facie truth. It held that documents forming part of the prosecution case cannot be discarded at the bail stage merely for admissibility objections, and that the embargo under Section 43D(5) applied. The refusal of bail was therefore sustained, with no view expressed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>