<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 768 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793387</link>
    <description>A Tribunal was held justified in treating the respondent&#039;s activities as outside taxable service, so service tax was not payable. The Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a Calcutta HC ruling, noting that a High Court judgment remains binding on the Tribunal until set aside or overruled. It also observed that the same view had earlier been accepted by the Supreme Court in a similar matter. On that basis, the impugned order was found well reasoned and not warranting interference, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 768 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793387</link>
      <description>A Tribunal was held justified in treating the respondent&#039;s activities as outside taxable service, so service tax was not payable. The Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a Calcutta HC ruling, noting that a High Court judgment remains binding on the Tribunal until set aside or overruled. It also observed that the same view had earlier been accepted by the Supreme Court in a similar matter. On that basis, the impugned order was found well reasoned and not warranting interference, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>