<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 769 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793388</link>
    <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was granted despite the stringent twin conditions in Section 45 because prolonged pre-trial incarceration weighed heavily with the Court. The allegations concerned serious laundering of proceeds of crime arising from recruitment irregularities, and the Court noted that the statutory hurdle on merits was not easy to cross, with concerns about tampering and the gravity of economic offences. Even so, the petitioner had spent about 2 years and 3 months in custody, had already obtained bail in the predicate cases after long detention, and the Court considered continued incarceration against Article 21. Bail was therefore allowed on the overall factual matrix.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 769 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793388</link>
      <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was granted despite the stringent twin conditions in Section 45 because prolonged pre-trial incarceration weighed heavily with the Court. The allegations concerned serious laundering of proceeds of crime arising from recruitment irregularities, and the Court noted that the statutory hurdle on merits was not easy to cross, with concerns about tampering and the gravity of economic offences. Even so, the petitioner had spent about 2 years and 3 months in custody, had already obtained bail in the predicate cases after long detention, and the Court considered continued incarceration against Article 21. Bail was therefore allowed on the overall factual matrix.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>