<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 772 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793391</link>
    <description>Re-imported goods attract customs duty under Section 20 of the Customs Act, but exemption may be granted through a Section 25 notification. The note explains that Notification No. 158/95-Customs and Notification No. 94/96-Customs operated on different factual bases: one covered re-import for specified processing and re-export, while the other addressed repayment of drawback on re-import. On the stated facts, documentary evidence linked the exports, re-imports, drawback repayment, processing under supervision and re-export, so the re-import exemption conditions were treated as satisfied and the consequential duty demand, redemption fine and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 772 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793391</link>
      <description>Re-imported goods attract customs duty under Section 20 of the Customs Act, but exemption may be granted through a Section 25 notification. The note explains that Notification No. 158/95-Customs and Notification No. 94/96-Customs operated on different factual bases: one covered re-import for specified processing and re-export, while the other addressed repayment of drawback on re-import. On the stated facts, documentary evidence linked the exports, re-imports, drawback repayment, processing under supervision and re-export, so the re-import exemption conditions were treated as satisfied and the consequential duty demand, redemption fine and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>