<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Threshold locus standi under Section 94 IBC can be examined first; personal guarantor status must be proved.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100770</link>
    <description>Threshold scrutiny of locus standi under Section 94 IBC is permissible because the tribunal must first verify the jurisdictional fact of personal guarantor status before assuming jurisdiction; that inquiry goes only to maintainability and does not decide insolvency merits. The text also notes that the Section 97 process, including appointment of a Resolution Professional, is not automatic unless the application is validly instituted. On the facts, the applicant was described only as a co-borrower, produced no guarantee deed despite opportunity, and a later demand notice could not by itself establish guarantor status, so the application was not entertainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Threshold locus standi under Section 94 IBC can be examined first; personal guarantor status must be proved.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100770</link>
      <description>Threshold scrutiny of locus standi under Section 94 IBC is permissible because the tribunal must first verify the jurisdictional fact of personal guarantor status before assuming jurisdiction; that inquiry goes only to maintainability and does not decide insolvency merits. The text also notes that the Section 97 process, including appointment of a Resolution Professional, is not automatic unless the application is validly instituted. On the facts, the applicant was described only as a co-borrower, produced no guarantee deed despite opportunity, and a later demand notice could not by itself establish guarantor status, so the application was not entertainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>