https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469302 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was refused where CDR location records, phone calls to co-accused, the alleged role as gang leader, a second invocation of the MCOC Act, and prior externment from Pune city together showed a strong evidentiary basis against the applicant. The Court held that mere assertions of absence from the spot or lack of direct demand allegations were insufficient. Given the material collected and the applicant's antecedents, it could not be said that there were reasonable grounds to believe she was not guilty, nor that she would not repeat similar conduct if released. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 21:16:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469302 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was refused where CDR location records, phone calls to co-accused, the alleged role as gang leader, a second invocation of the MCOC Act, and prior externment from Pune city together showed a strong evidentiary basis against the applicant. The Court held that mere assertions of absence from the spot or lack of direct demand allegations were insufficient. Given the material collected and the applicant's antecedents, it could not be said that there were reasonable grounds to believe she was not guilty, nor that she would not repeat similar conduct if released. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469302