<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1819 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469307</link>
    <description>Bail was granted on parity where the petitioner&#039;s alleged role did not include the main firing incident and the co-accused with substantially similar circumstances had already been released on bail. The Court also treated the petitioner&#039;s long incarceration of about 4.5 years as a relevant factor, noting it exceeded the period considered for the co-accused. On that combined basis of parity and prolonged custody, the petitioner was held entitled to bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 21:16:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1819 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469307</link>
      <description>Bail was granted on parity where the petitioner&#039;s alleged role did not include the main firing incident and the co-accused with substantially similar circumstances had already been released on bail. The Court also treated the petitioner&#039;s long incarceration of about 4.5 years as a relevant factor, noting it exceeded the period considered for the co-accused. On that combined basis of parity and prolonged custody, the petitioner was held entitled to bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>