<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1771 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469314</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits in a nationalised bank was not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) because that provision applies only to interest or dividend derived from investments with another co-operative society. Decisions relating to section 80P(2)(a) were held inapplicable since the claim was not made under that provision and the factual basis for that line of authority was absent. The disallowance was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1771 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469314</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits in a nationalised bank was not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) because that provision applies only to interest or dividend derived from investments with another co-operative society. Decisions relating to section 80P(2)(a) were held inapplicable since the claim was not made under that provision and the factual basis for that line of authority was absent. The disallowance was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>