<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1735 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469320</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society on fixed deposits made from its own surplus funds with a co-operative bank was treated as attributable to the society&#039;s eligible co-operative ity for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The analysis distinguished interest arising from members&#039; money held as liabilities, which was said to stand on a different footing. On the facts recorded, the deposits were made from the society&#039;s own surplus funds and the society was engaged in eligible co-operative activities, so the deduction was allowable. The revisionary order under section 263 disallowing the deduction was therefore not sustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 21:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1735 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469320</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society on fixed deposits made from its own surplus funds with a co-operative bank was treated as attributable to the society&#039;s eligible co-operative ity for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The analysis distinguished interest arising from members&#039; money held as liabilities, which was said to stand on a different footing. On the facts recorded, the deposits were made from the society&#039;s own surplus funds and the society was engaged in eligible co-operative activities, so the deduction was allowable. The revisionary order under section 263 disallowing the deduction was therefore not sustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>