https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469300 In bail proceedings under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, Section 21(4) requires prima facie satisfaction on broad probabilities that the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend, with the key enquiry being whether a nexus with the organised crime syndicate is shown. The Court held that prior charge-sheets relate to the syndicate, not each accused individually, but there must still be prima facie material linking the accused to that syndicate. On the material before it, the nexus was not sufficiently made out against Amjad Yusuf Pathan, Pravin s/o Laxmichand Shanklesha and Dhanraj @ Munna s/o Nitin Shah, but it was established against Vivek @ Vicky Janak Paneri through identification evidence, CCTV material and witness statements. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:18:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469300 In bail proceedings under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, Section 21(4) requires prima facie satisfaction on broad probabilities that the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend, with the key enquiry being whether a nexus with the organised crime syndicate is shown. The Court held that prior charge-sheets relate to the syndicate, not each accused individually, but there must still be prima facie material linking the accused to that syndicate. On the material before it, the nexus was not sufficiently made out against Amjad Yusuf Pathan, Pravin s/o Laxmichand Shanklesha and Dhanraj @ Munna s/o Nitin Shah, but it was established against Vivek @ Vicky Janak Paneri through identification evidence, CCTV material and witness statements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469300