https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469297 In a prosecution under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, the Bombay HC examined whether bail could be granted where the record indicated membership of an organised crime syndicate and continuing unlawful activity. The material included co-accused disclosure implicating the applicant, recovery of money at his instance, and call detail records showing repeated contact with co-accused. The Court stated that membership and participation under the statute are assessed through the statutory definitions and need not be confined to direct presence at the scene. Applying the Section 21(4) restrictions, it found sufficient prima facie material and no reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not involved, so bail was refused. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:50:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469297 In a prosecution under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, the Bombay HC examined whether bail could be granted where the record indicated membership of an organised crime syndicate and continuing unlawful activity. The material included co-accused disclosure implicating the applicant, recovery of money at his instance, and call detail records showing repeated contact with co-accused. The Court stated that membership and participation under the statute are assessed through the statutory definitions and need not be confined to direct presence at the scene. Applying the Section 21(4) restrictions, it found sufficient prima facie material and no reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not involved, so bail was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469297