<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 209 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on one appellant due to insufficient evidence linking the currency to the confiscated gold biscuits and invalidated the confiscation of currency due to procedural violations, ultimately allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 209 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on one appellant due to insufficient evidence linking the currency to the confiscated gold biscuits and invalidated the confiscation of currency due to procedural violations, ultimately allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>